*On a global average; national levels differ.
*On a global average; national levels differ.
HelloFresh commissioned an ISO 14040 compliant and peer-reviewed life cycle analysis (LCA) study that demonstrated how cooking with HelloFresh produces fewer carbon emissions than both restaurant delivery services and cooking with ingredients from the supermarket.
This cradle-to-grave study was based on an analysis of meal kits from three different protein categories (beef, chicken, vegetarian recipes) provided by HelloFresh in four regional markets representing 80% of HelloFresh’s total 2020 annual volume:
To calculate the global average of the carbon emissions for every meal, beyond an average impact (kgCO2e) of each protein meal for each provision system provided by the study, we took into account several factors, including sales data and market split.
To obtain the global average carbon emissions per meal, we first calculated an average of the carbon impact of each protein meal, weighted by the meals sold in 2020 in the four regional markets considered. For example, the impact of a beef burger from HelloFresh varies between 6.3 kgCO2e to 7.4 kgCO2e across different markets (HelloFresh LCA study, page 13)
.
By creating an average of this range, weighted by the numbers of meals sold in each region, we obtained a global average impact of 6.9 kgCO2e for the beef burger meal. Then we averaged the obtained global impacts of the three meal types, weighted by the volumes of protein types sold in the same year.
Finally, the difference in carbon emissions between HelloFresh's meals and competitors’ meals was calculated as a percentage by looking at the average global warming potential across the three provisioning systems.
On a global average, the carbon emission of HelloFresh meals are 5.5% lower in comparison to the ones of restaurant delivery and 25% lower in comparison to supermarkets’, indicating that HelloFresh recipes have an overall lower impact on the climate.
Learn more about the Life Cycle Assessment study
.